Jump to content



Photo

Listen, You Two "Gentlemen"


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 dowdeva

dowdeva

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 507 posts

Posted 15 May 2020 - 01:43 PM

That post is from a doctor who treats Covid patients in a hospital. I could probably get his number for you if you'd like.

 

https://www.traders-...tors-in-gilead/

 

What's with the knee jerk conspiracy s--t comments? ACT LIKE GENTLEMEN. DO YOUR F'ING DD AND THEN COME BACK AND SAY SOMETHING WITH ACCREDITATION.

 

THE FILINGS ARE ON THE WEB.

 

SPARE ME FROM FOOLS!


Edited by OEXCHAOS, 15 May 2020 - 03:16 PM.


#2 OEXCHAOS

OEXCHAOS

    Mark S. Young

  • Admin
  • 20,309 posts

Posted 15 May 2020 - 03:20 PM

While you are too often treated rudely, I am compelled to point out that extraordinary claims require solid documentation, if you want people to take them seriously. It's not up to readers to refute unsupported assertions, it's up to we who make claims to support them. Otherwise, we're just creating noise and eating up other folks' time.

So, how about commenters, try to be a bit more polite, and how about you try to source the more extraordinary claims?

Mark


Mark S Young
Wall Street Sentiment
Get a free trial here:
http://wallstreetsen...t.com/trial.htm
You can now follow me on twitter


#3 dowdeva

dowdeva

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 507 posts

Posted 15 May 2020 - 08:47 PM

Mark, I have in the past. I have linked to data until I am blue in the face. It doesn't do any good.  They just like to troll. There are so many good traders who don't post here anymore because of trolls like that.

 

However, it's a good point you made and well taken. I will contact the doctor and ask him for links for the more serious traders.



#4 dwnowhere1

dwnowhere1

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 51 posts

Posted 16 May 2020 - 09:53 PM

Since I was the first poster, my apologizes if you felt I was rude.

I'm not a troll.  Been monitoring this board for years, just post little.  

I go out of my way to make a valid argument both for and against depending on the post.

 

I am compelled to point out that extraordinary claims require solid documentation

This is the key point.  As pointed out this information was NOT part of the original post.

 

Can't speak for others, but my idea of "solid documentation" is a quote from some person or organization who is an expert in their field

NOT an article that "supposedly" details what they said.

The reason for this is there was a guy in California who was putting out "what appeared" to be valid internet articles but was

usurping (altering them slightly)  to support his own agenda.   The underlying purpose was to target certain audiences so he could

increase his hit count, which translates to $$$$.

 

That said the reader also has a responsibility NOT to take everything said as being the ultimate truth.

In latin terms, "Caveat Emptor".

-- or as my father used to say when we were kids --

"Don't believe eveything you read or someone tells you.   You head is to be used for more than a hat rack!"


Edited by dwnowhere1, 16 May 2020 - 09:56 PM.