Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 10:18 AM
well all i can say is this is fun fun fun i loves it
my approach is morning was that if it takes out
yesterdays highs we would move about 200 dollars
well 182.83 is gone could this thing actually rally all the
way up to the 203 area on gld. seems incredible but never
say never. anyway so far everyday my account is up i likes it
Edited by gannman, 28 July 2020 - 10:21 AM.
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 10:29 AM
well all i can say is this is fun fun fun i loves it
my approach is morning was that if it takes out
yesterdays highs we would move about 200 dollars
well 182.83 is gone could this thing actually rally all the
way up to the 203 area on gld. seems incredible but never
say never. anyway so far everyday my account is up i likes it
I will reiterate that I think it very likely gold has 5 down from 1981 to 1906 and we are about done with a near term abc bounce (1955-1960 ending perhaps with one more upward subdivision basis 15 min chart?). I am a bull but I favor further correction, we see
Senor
Edited by senorBS, 28 July 2020 - 10:30 AM.
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 10:51 AM
i hear ya and i have no problem at all with more correction here
thats for suree
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 11:13 AM
i hear ya and i have no problem at all with more correction here
thats for suree
Fed day tomorrow, tricky trading for next 36 hours.
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 01:35 PM
SI still looking pretty good after the sharp initial pull back.
think there is a decent chance we test that 26 high level, maybe a bit higher before this leg is over...
The strength of Government lies in the people's ignorance, and the Government knows this, and will therefore always oppose true enlightenment. - Leo Tolstoy
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 06:30 PM
i hear ya and i have no problem at all with more correction here
thats for suree
also 8 straight days up in gold, that's gettin very "stretched" and with a Fed day tomorrow I would expect some "action"
Senor
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 08:31 PM
island top tomorrow?
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 10:55 PM
Dougie, the simplest count that supports the fundamentals is best. It seems this does neither 
Member
Posted 28 July 2020 - 11:01 PM
Dougie, the simplest count that supports the fundamentals is best. It seems this does neither
Smithy: i dont disagree but the poster usualy doe a good job, this is in line with Linrom i think
https://www.tradingo...-keep-climbing/
