Mark, we had this argument 15 years ago, check your posts, I have excellent memory of you saying just the opposite.... that you had to know whether you were in a bull or bear market for longer term decision-making.
So you have changed your mind, have you?
Which Mark???
..well exactly.
If it was me - heck, 15 years ago..I change my mind on stuff ..I think its called 'learning/experience'...i've learnt ALOT in the last 15 years and changed my mind on many things that is for sure.
I have bit more time so let me say, I believe Mark(OEX) has a very good sense of the market, which is maybe something that is not totally quantifiable in TA .we could loosely call it 'read of the tape' which
is very experienced based. Whether that is partly due to knowing what the main trend is - bull/bear ... partly but I see in my own evolution that is partly the 'school of market hard knocks' type deal -learning what is
important and what isn't - and I think, some of this is very hard to communicate to others, so, we may say things differently and kind of argue semantics but end up actually thinking similarly.
So what I was trying to say in that post about prediction, was more about avoiding being dogmatic and rigid in belief about a certain trend ...more than saying its not useful to know the trend - obviously its very useful to
know if it a bull or bear! ...but my point is, we cannot know for sure - and maybe best we can do is 60-80% 'sureness' .. and so we must remain flexible to change that view based ideally on some method that shows
good backtested history.
Right now If I was forced to answer i've said my 'math' says its a bear market - and turns to bull if we get a weekly close above 4300 ....but my main goals is to try to be in synch with the one trend below that but it changes,
sometimes that trend is also 'murky' so as I said
->its about trying to synch with the clearest trend you can identify, whatever that is!
hope this is clearer.
Edited by EntropyModel, 23 February 2023 - 01:10 PM.