Repricing of risk or Systemic?
#1
Posted 31 July 2007 - 11:28 PM
A few charts from the TA arsenal
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$NAMO&p=D&yr=10&mn=6&dy=0&i=p32209562612&a=77448291&r=9372.png
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$NYHGH&p=W&yr=10&mn=6&dy=0&i=p96184184708&a=79051277&r=4953.png
#2
Posted 01 August 2007 - 01:38 AM
What strikes me looking at your annotations is how the current period seems most analogous to the April '00 period you've labelled "Y2K" on your chart.
At that April '00 low, the same extreme divergence between price and $NAMO showed up, just like now.
(This may answer a question I'd been wondering about, i.e. why such momentum indicators appear to work well within a secular trend, but do not seem reliable indicators for changes in trend.
Thanks again.
Edited by beta, 01 August 2007 - 01:39 AM.
#3
Posted 01 August 2007 - 07:05 AM
Thx. Hadn't noticed that, but good observation. I don't yet think we put in a major top, but we've had an extremely long period of low volatility in both stocks and bonds and a major bear void for stocks, so I'm guessing this is the one that shakes everyone out and wipes out excess speculation....James Quillian showed a margin chart recently highlighting all that gearing. Unwinding takes time.....Great charts, MN. I recall your timely "heads up" warning early last week.
What strikes me looking at your annotations is how the current period seems most analogous to the April '00 period you've labelled "Y2K" on your chart.
At that April '00 low, the same extreme divergence between price and $NAMO showed up, just like now.
(This may answer a question I'd been wondering about, i.e. why such momentum indicators appear to work well within a secular trend, but do not seem reliable indicators for changes in trend.
Thanks again.
GT and GL