Edited by SemiBizz, 18 August 2007 - 07:57 PM.
What's different this time?
#1
Posted 18 August 2007 - 07:55 PM
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#2
Posted 18 August 2007 - 09:59 PM
Edited by SemiBizz, 18 August 2007 - 10:04 PM.
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#3
Posted 18 August 2007 - 10:18 PM
#4
Posted 18 August 2007 - 10:25 PM
http://bigcharts.mar...&mocktick=1.gif
And that hasn't happened... so good luck trend-fighters.
Edited by SemiBizz, 18 August 2007 - 10:34 PM.
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#5
Posted 19 August 2007 - 12:27 AM
The ratings agencies have put 101 different CDOs on "watch," which is market speak for "we are probably going to change our rating." But that's a little too late.
In 2006, nearly $850 million or 44% (up from 37% in 2002) of Moody's Investors Service total revenue came from the rarefied business known as structured finance. In 1995, its revenue from such transactions was a paltry $50 million. Moody's took in around $3 billion from 2002 through 2006 for rating securities built from loans and other debt pools. The same pattern holds for Standard and Poor's and Fitch.
In short, the ratings agencies were making huge amounts of money from the investment banks for rating these structured products. And let's make no mistake about it, they were selling their name and credibility. Everyone knew what a AAA rating meant when it came to a corporation or a country. And even though there were disclaimers in the 500-page documents accompanying the CDO sales material, the investment banks were clearly pointing to the ratings as they sold that paper.
The entire process hinged on the credibility of the rating agencies. Somehow, no one seemed to think that the default rates from "no-documentation" and "liar" loans would possibly be different. I am sure you can find a paragraph in the offering documents which will make that contention, at least obliquely. Lawyers are good at that stuff. But that is entirely beside the point.
http://www.2000wave.com/gateway.asp
Defenders of the status quo are always stronger than reformers seeking change,
UNTIL the status quo self-destructs from its own corruption, and the reformers are free to build on its ashes.
#6
Posted 19 August 2007 - 07:11 AM
#7
Posted 19 August 2007 - 11:50 AM
#8
Posted 19 August 2007 - 12:08 PM
In addition, the Fed would not only lower the Fed Funds rate, but would also buy up ALL the paper nobody no longer wants (at least for now) and allows it to sit on its books. Unfortunately, this paper would have to sit on the Fed's books a whole lot longer than 30 days.
But while the strategy may save the equity markets near-term, the longer term ramifications are unclear.
The Fed will write any losses off its books and no one will ever notice in the big scheme of things ? Who ever checks the Fed's books.
If they tighten the lending standards going forward, the toxic paper will be dissolved overtime among higher quality credit.
And by the looks of it they have purged most of this low quality lending already. All those AHM type garbage lenders went belly up and the big banks for the most part exited subprime. So the quality of the paper will star improving.
Also don't forget a lot of big players are scooping up the subprime paper at Distressed levels. Look at Blackrock, GS, JPM, Citadel announcements. They will take some of this junk at pennies on the dollar from overleveraged hedgehogs. They will make money.
The situation will resolve over time.
Edited by ogm, 19 August 2007 - 12:09 PM.
#9
Posted 19 August 2007 - 12:31 PM
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#10
Posted 19 August 2007 - 12:51 PM