7 replies to this topic

[eminimee]

http://stockcharts.c...4795&r=9772.png

[underabigw]

Hummmm! TP, I mostly lurk here but wanted to take a moment to comment on how much I appreciate your thoughtful and insightful work/charts. You are a real asset to this board and one of the main reasons I have the FF board on my "speed dial". Thanks again, UBW

[spielchekr]

Hey Tea, what's your interpretation of the discrepancies?

http://stockcharts.c...7713&r=4398.png

http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$NDXE&p=D&b=5&g=0&i=t00459475923&r=2986.png

[eminimee]

spielchekr, no idea. I don't think either one pays a dividend but that could make the difference. NDXE has only been around for two years so I'll stick with QQEW for now

[espresso]

The difference for my case is that the spike on Qs gave me the only accurate sell signal around... (a part crude!). Adding on that the weakness on Value Line (ready for C) and Tran and a possibly explosive chart of Vxn and Vix I think we're about to go down. Fundamentally speaking i think that the manipulation is right at the point to test the reality, where they did all they could ...but really didn't work! Let see what happen next. jmho

[Echo]

Teaparty,

I think you need to discard this one as an aberration occurring in an extremely low volume issue:

http://stockcharts.c...id=p52276509341

Edited by Echo, 22 September 2007 - 01:40 PM.

[espresso]

The only chance i give to the bulls is in a forcast that youmast post longtime ago in his Ssignal called something like "the Bernanke dream". Youmast hoping you're reading this, can you post that chart again for the good of the board? Thanks

[eminimee]

http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$XBD&p=D&yr=1&mn=6&dy=0&i=p38065292603&a=85988535&r=668.png