Jump to content



Photo

dcengr Thank You


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Darris

Darris

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,667 posts

Posted 12 October 2007 - 04:36 PM

Thank you for posting your study yesterday. Did not even have to wait 2 days for 2%, LOL. QQQQ close yesterday $52.66, and I have seen a print of $53.75 in after hours this evening. Sharp down days in a strong uptrend are gifts to buy. Gap up on Monday should pucker the Bears AGAIN, so if we do not see new highs on Monday, Tuesday will be a given. Enjoy the weekend. :redbull: :redbull: :redbull:

#2 dcengr

dcengr

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 13,391 posts

Posted 12 October 2007 - 07:22 PM

Your welcome. The next move is whatever happens between now and open monday... Inside day patterns in the S&P by Toby Crabel Computer studies suggest that inside days— where the high is lower than the previous ! day's high and the low is higher than the previous day's low— provide very reliable t entries in the S&P 500 futures market. The basic trading pattern (Figure 1) is an inside day (ID) followed by a sale if the next day's market opens lower or a buy if next day's market opens higher. Entry is on the open and exit is on the same day's close without a stop. In computerized tests, this basic procedure produced 68% winning trades in the S&P between 1982 and 1987. Total net profit from these trades was $18,000 after an $18-per-trade commission. This is a reasonably high percentage and suggests a strong tendency or bias for prices to continue in the direction of the open the day after any inside day. Refinements One simple variation of this pattern—discerning | whether the ID close and next day's open are in the same direction—produces an even higher percentage of winning trades. In Figure 2a, the ID has a higher close than the previous day and is followed by a higher open. A buy is taken on the open and exited on the close. A sale is taken when the ID has a lower close and is followed by a lower open (Figure 2b).

Edited by dcengr, 12 October 2007 - 07:23 PM.

Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?