Jump to content



Photo

Shipping Stocks


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 diogenes227

diogenes227

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 5,120 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 02:51 PM

across the board, DRYS, GNK, DSX, TBSI, EXM, NM, QMAR, etc... What is that, nobody is shipping anything anymore, or does Cramer just love the sector too much?

"If you've heard this story before, don't stop me because I'd like to hear it again," Groucho Marx (on market history?).

“I've learned in options trading simple is best and the obvious is often the most elusive to recognize.”

 

"The god of trading rewards persistence, experience and discipline, and absolutely nothing else."


#2 relax

relax

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,224 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 02:57 PM

this again proves that cramer is stupid money big time shipping stocks are down because of ffa's, big player chose to take profits sending futures market quite a bit down but looking at physical fixtures and fundamentals, this sector has more to go not enough ships, longer transport distance and port congestion are the main factors

#3 SandStorm

SandStorm

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 457 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:04 PM

Briefing.com ran this Live In Play 30-Oct-07 15:50 TALKX Floor Talk: Afternoon sell-off The sell-off in the final hour of the session can best be described as a domino effect: The biggest momentum group in the market, the drybulk shippers (DRYS, EXM, DSX, GNK), sold off hard on heavy volume after a "bearish" dayrate report was released. There were a lot of weak longs in this group, and once they got taken down, other momentum groups got sold (look at the Ag Chemical stocks, for example). In turn, this led to profit-taking in the broad mkt, which has taken down the major averages to session lows heading into the close.

#4 diogenes227

diogenes227

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 5,120 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:05 PM

CNBC is discussing them the selloff now. A cut in dry-goods rates. But as usual, CNBC is confused...

"If you've heard this story before, don't stop me because I'd like to hear it again," Groucho Marx (on market history?).

“I've learned in options trading simple is best and the obvious is often the most elusive to recognize.”

 

"The god of trading rewards persistence, experience and discipline, and absolutely nothing else."


#5 denleo

denleo

    Member

  • Chartist
  • 3,097 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:08 PM

Who cares about shipping when we got Google. Searching is more important for the economy than shipping. It is the new economy, remember? Denleo

#6 nicolasillo

nicolasillo

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,441 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:13 PM

DRYS, I have warned about this stock previously!
This company defaulted back in 1998 in their high yield bond .......
Company lost lots of money in FFAs recently as well.
No more comments on this company because of its owner...he doesn t have a good reputation in the shipping cycles!

this again proves that cramer is stupid money big time

shipping stocks are down because of ffa's, big player chose to take profits sending futures market quite a bit down

but looking at physical fixtures and fundamentals, this sector has more to go

not enough ships, longer transport distance and port congestion are the main factors



there are enough ships and more to come! just the producing companies create this conjestion at the ports, benefiting in that way both themsleves and the shipping companies....... all this DRY BULK mania in the shipping sector was driven by FFAs and as you said a big player decided to take some profits!

Edited by nicolasillo, 30 October 2007 - 03:11 PM.


#7 ogm

ogm

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 13,780 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:14 PM

Who cares about shipping when we got Google. Searching is more important for the economy than shipping. It is the new economy, remember?

Denleo



The one who seeks always finds :)


In this case the cause for the sell off.

Edited by ogm, 30 October 2007 - 03:15 PM.


#8 nicolasillo

nicolasillo

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,441 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:14 PM

Who cares about shipping when we got Google. Searching is more important for the economy than shipping. It is the new economy, remember?

Denleo



Denleo......is google going to be transporting the goods via internet as well? It was always the seaborne trade and it will always be. Unless, Google have something in mind to do it over the internet

#9 greenie

greenie

    Member

  • Traders-Talk ~
  • 3,184 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:16 PM

Who cares about shipping when we got Google. Searching is more important for the economy than shipping. It is the new economy, remember?

Denleo



Despite our previous disagreements on other topics, I agree with you completely here. Shipping, manufacturing and even working hard are for old-fashioned people...you know the less sophisticated ones :). The new economy is based on searching, surfing, checking stock quotes on a mobile phone, which also happens to download music. If you are not good enough for that, borrow subprime and go foreclosed - as simple as that.


:redbull: GOOG
:redbull: AAPL

:bear: working
It is not the doing that is difficult, but the knowing


It's the illiquidity, stupid !

#10 denleo

denleo

    Member

  • Chartist
  • 3,097 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:17 PM

Who cares about shipping when we got Google. Searching is more important for the economy than shipping. It is the new economy, remember?

Denleo



Denleo......is google going to be transporting the goods via internet as well? It was always the seaborne trade and it will always be. Unless, Google have something in mind to do it over the internet


GOOG can do everything. At 700 the market is pricing in not only transporting goods via internet, but cancer cure and world piece, all brought to you by GOOGLE, as well.

Denleo