HGNSI at 37.9% as of Sept 23
#11
Posted 24 September 2008 - 11:53 AM
#12
Posted 24 September 2008 - 12:12 PM
yes, anything is possible. but is it probable. the C wave is yesterdays news. keep positing your bearish views on gold. i like it, it gets my juices flowing. good luck w/it. dharmaI recall being early some time ago, and took on a margined position. I told people about it. I seriously alomst lost my shirt and got into major debt. At the 11th hour, I had margin calls maybe 5 times a day...when is the money coming..whenn....when....I told them the cheque was in the post. Anyway I put them off for about 5 days and luckily on the last day the thing sprung to life and I went off margin.
I can tell you it wasnt pleasant and never ever again. Its an irony how hold stocks can be most volatile yet supposed to represent lowest market risk.
I can sympathize, having learned from past experience that nothing in the markets is more brutal than a PM correction.
To put things into context, this recent bounce in gold stocks comes AFTER a 50% swift haircut from the peak in late summer.
I suspect quite a few perma-bulls got caught holding thru that brutal decline, and are only now recovering their NAV (although they are not honest enough to admit it).
#13
Posted 24 September 2008 - 12:17 PM
yes, anything is possible. but is it probable. the C wave is yesterdays news. keep positing your bearish views on gold. i like it, it gets my juices flowing. good luck w/it. dharmaI recall being early some time ago, and took on a margined position. I told people about it. I seriously alomst lost my shirt and got into major debt. At the 11th hour, I had margin calls maybe 5 times a day...when is the money coming..whenn....when....I told them the cheque was in the post. Anyway I put them off for about 5 days and luckily on the last day the thing sprung to life and I went off margin.
I can tell you it wasnt pleasant and never ever again. Its an irony how hold stocks can be most volatile yet supposed to represent lowest market risk.
I can sympathize, having learned from past experience that nothing in the markets is more brutal than a PM correction.
To put things into context, this recent bounce in gold stocks comes AFTER a 50% swift haircut from the peak in late summer.
I suspect quite a few perma-bulls got caught holding thru that brutal decline, and are only now recovering their NAV (although they are not honest enough to admit it).
I never said Im a "bear" on gold. However, unlike some who want to see gold as a one-way market, Im open to considering possibilities other than the bullish case short-term. I posted my BUYS near the recent lows and closed out my trade yesterday with 30% gains. Good enough for me.
Ill wait to see if the recent run-up continues, but would you be buying new positions here ??
Everyone has their own style for making money. Buy-and-hold works until it doesnt.
I believe gold is in a secular trend until it breaks below 550, but frankly, Im not going to wait and see if that happens.
Edited by beta, 24 September 2008 - 12:19 PM.
#14
Posted 24 September 2008 - 12:34 PM
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#15
Posted 24 September 2008 - 01:26 PM
one last thought , gold did not trade in the 29-32 time period, but hm did and it went from 3-144 in that time frame. dharmayes, anything is possible. but is it probable. the C wave is yesterdays news. keep positing your bearish views on gold. i like it, it gets my juices flowing. good luck w/it. dharmaI recall being early some time ago, and took on a margined position. I told people about it. I seriously alomst lost my shirt and got into major debt. At the 11th hour, I had margin calls maybe 5 times a day...when is the money coming..whenn....when....I told them the cheque was in the post. Anyway I put them off for about 5 days and luckily on the last day the thing sprung to life and I went off margin.
I can tell you it wasnt pleasant and never ever again. Its an irony how hold stocks can be most volatile yet supposed to represent lowest market risk.
I can sympathize, having learned from past experience that nothing in the markets is more brutal than a PM correction.
To put things into context, this recent bounce in gold stocks comes AFTER a 50% swift haircut from the peak in late summer.
I suspect quite a few perma-bulls got caught holding thru that brutal decline, and are only now recovering their NAV (although they are not honest enough to admit it).
I never said Im a "bear" on gold. However, unlike some who want to see gold as a one-way market, Im open to considering possibilities other than the bullish case short-term. I posted my BUYS near the recent lows and closed out my trade yesterday with 30% gains. Good enough for me.
Ill wait to see if the recent run-up continues, but would you be buying new positions here ??
Everyone has their own style for making money. Buy-and-hold works until it doesnt.
I believe gold is in a secular trend until it breaks below 550, but frankly, Im not going to wait and see if that happens.
#16
Posted 24 September 2008 - 03:02 PM
The future is 90% present and 10% vision.
#17
Posted 24 September 2008 - 03:41 PM
#18
Posted 24 September 2008 - 03:51 PM
my only point is that bears live below the 200 and bulls above it...surely its better to wait until that level is cleared, even if you are a perma bool? I mean it could go much lower, no?Absolutely not. I still dont get your point. Why are you asking me that? What is your purpose? Goal? I'm long gold, period.
The future is 90% present and 10% vision.
#19
Posted 24 September 2008 - 04:28 PM
was 27.9 a week or so ago
BTW, 37.9% is still a relatively low reading, based on historical extremes. So whatever correction is coming will likely be a pullback before we see higher prices.
#20
Posted 24 September 2008 - 04:56 PM
was 27.9 a week or so ago
BTW, 37.9% is still a relatively low reading, based on historical extremes. So whatever correction is coming will likely be a pullback before we see higher prices.
Actually, looking at data back to 1997, low was abt -30, 4/15/05 High 89 2/15/02
Lowest we got on this dip 6.4, after such a big haircut we didnt even go negative......maybe it goes higher but I think we need to get negative before any meaningful rally