Jump to content



Photo

Half of US Doctors use placebo treatments


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 23 October 2008 - 07:00 PM

Mommas have been kissing "boo-boos" for years with amazing results.
Witch doctors have been casting out evil spirits with great effectiveness.
US doctors have likewise effectively been using mind over matter to comfort patients when nothing else would help.
I agree that
at times it just might be ethical and the best treatment.

Posted Image

Survey: Half of US doctors use placebo treatments
Oct 23, 7:04 PM
By MARIA CHENG

LONDON (AP) - About half of American doctors in a new survey say they regularly give patients placebo treatments - usually drugs or vitamins that won't really help their condition. And many of these doctors are not honest with their patients about what they are doing, the survey found.

That contradicts advice from the American Medical Association, which recommends doctors use treatments with the full knowledge of their patients.

"It's a disturbing finding," said Franklin G. Miller, director of the research ethics program at the U.S. National Institutes Health and one of the study authors. "There is an element of deception here which is contrary to the principle of informed consent."

The study was being published online in Friday's issue of BMJ, formerly the British Medical Journal.

Placebos as defined in the survey went beyond the typical sugar pill commonly used in medical studies. A placebo was any treatment that wouldn't necessarily help the patient.

Scientists have long known of the "placebo effect," in which patients given a fake or ineffective treatment often improve anyway, simply because they expected to get better.

"Doctors may be under a lot of pressure to help their patients, but this is not an acceptable shortcut," said Irving Kirsch, a professor of psychology at the University of Hull in Britain who has studied the use of placebos.

Researchers at the NIH sent surveys to a random sample of 1,200 internists and rheumatologists - doctors who treat arthritis and other joint problems. They received 679 responses. Of those doctors, 62 percent believed that using a placebo treatment was ethically acceptable.

Half the doctors reported using placebos several times a month, nearly 70 percent of those described the treatment to their patients as "a potentially beneficial medicine not typically used for your condition." Only 5 percent of doctors explicitly called it a placebo treatment.

Most doctors used actual medicines as a placebo treatment: 41 percent used painkillers, 38 percent used vitamins, 13 percent used antibiotics, 13 percent used sedatives, 3 percent used saline injections, and 2 percent used sugar pills.

In the survey, doctors were asked if they would recommend a sugar pill for patients with chronic pain if it had been shown to be more effective than no treatment. Nearly 60 percent said they would.

Smaller studies done elsewhere, including Britain, Denmark and Sweden, have found similar results.

Jon Tilburt, the lead author of the U.S. study, who is with NIH's bioethics department, said he believes the doctors surveyed were representative of internists and rheumatologists across the U.S. No statistical work was done to establish whether the survey results would apply to other medical specialists, such as pediatricians or surgeons.

The research was paid for by NIH's bioethics department and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

The authors said most doctors probably reasoned that doing something was better than doing nothing.

In some cases, placebos were given to patients with conditions such as chronic fatigue syndrome. Doctors also gave antibiotics to patients with viral bronchitis, knowing full well that a virus is impervious to antibiotics, which fight bacteria. Experts believe overuse of antibiotics promotes the development of drug-resistant strains of bacteria.

Some doctors believe placebos are a good treatment in certain situations, as long as patients are told what they are being given. Dr. Walter Brown, a professor of psychiatry at Brown and Tufts universities, said people with insomnia, depression or high blood pressure often respond well to placebo treatments.

"You could tell those patients that this is something that doesn't have any medicine in it but has been shown to work in people with your condition," he suggested.

However, experts don't know if the placebo effect would be undermined if patients were explicitly told they were getting a dummy pill.

Brown said that while he hasn't prescribed sugar pills, he has given people with anxiety problems pills that had extremely low doses of medication. "The dose was so low that whatever effect the patients were getting was probably a placebo effect," he said.

Kirsch, the psychologist, said it might be possible to get the psychological impact without using a fake pill. "If doctors just spent more time with their patients so they felt more reassured, that might help," he said.

Some patients who had just seen their doctors at a clinic in London said the truth was paramount.

"I would feel very cheated if I was given a placebo," said Ruth Schachter, an 86-year-old Londoner with skin cancer. "I like to have my eyes wide open, even if it's bad news," she said. "If I'm given something without being warned what it is, I certainly would not trust the doctor again."

LINK

#2 OEXCHAOS

OEXCHAOS

    Mark S. Young

  • Admin
  • 22,041 posts

Posted 27 October 2008 - 07:55 AM

I'm a firm believer in the power of placebo, but as a rationalist, I'd rather just be told that there's no drug for what ails me if that's the case. I probably didn't want to take one anyway. In fact, I'm much more concerned about the effects of many if not most drugs on my body. I would suspect that many Docs would be well served to avoid prescribing drugs that are unlikely to help, even if they THINK that they are unlikely to hurt. And maybe pay attention to possible environmental factors. E.g. sometimes, a chronic sinus infection is less about an infection and more about mold, dust, and/or allergies. Mark

Mark S Young
Wall Street Sentiment
Get a free trial here:
http://wallstreetsen...t.com/trial.htm
You can now follow me on twitter


#3 maineman

maineman

    maineman

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 27 October 2008 - 08:29 AM

There is another side to this story. With the "glut" of medicine in our society, including so-called "alternative" medicine, numerous popular doctor TV shows and the barrage of internet information, the public is increasingly unwilling to accept the reassuring truth. Telling a patient they have a virus and its going to take several days to get better is often countered with an anectode about a friend/neighbor/relative who just got XYZ treatment from their doctor. Or they were told by a friend (etc) to use zinc, Vitamin C etc (all placebos by the way according to medical research). A patient with the pain and depression of say, "fibromyalgia" is unlikely to be content being told they have to take better care of themselves, exercise, etc. They will always doctor-shop until they get a prescription. It's a very complicated issue. "Placebo" diagnoses are classic in medicine. How many people do you know with "lumbago" or "Sacroiliitis" or "migraines" or "sinus infection" or "Sinus headache"... the list is endless. The placebo diagnoses used to be very effective, patients felt reassured. As medicine matured and the use of "false" information was felt to be unethical, patients went elsewhere, hence the growth of healthfood stores, chiropractors, naturopaths, accupuncture, macrobiotics, the vitamin mega-industry, etc. People created their own placebos. Chicken soup.... still the best... mm
He who laughs laughs laughs laughs.

My Blog -Maineman Market Advice

#4 Mike McCarthy

Mike McCarthy

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 402 posts

Posted 27 October 2008 - 08:49 AM

This article and its assertions such high percentages of doctors routinely mis-prescribe is quite insane on many levels. Informed consent is required for ANY treatment, and giving placebos is a violation of that requirement. Health care providers who violate that mandate can be disciplined ranging from insurers refusing to pay to losing rights to practice to criminal prosecution. You just can't lie. (Placebos are used in research all the time, of course, but in those cases all participants in the study are informed up front that placebos might or might not be used, and that they might of might not be getting a placebo. The participant thereby grants informed consent even though they never really know what treatment they receive. That's a far cry from their doctor plainly lying to them.) Duty to inform extends beyond direct treatment. Under different circumstance health care providers may have a duty to disclose alternative therapies (surgery, physical therapy, watchful waiting, even non-traditional remedies like acupuncture). Providers also may have a duty to inform about life expectancy. For exampe, a patient with terminal gastric cancer must be (not should be) informed what the odds are that a recommended gastrectomy (removal of stomach) will extend life (odds are slim to none, btw). Yes, a gastrectomy will "do no harm," but the provider has obligations beyond that simple mantra. And there are many other situations regarding not only administration of treatment but also including financial and privacy arenas. Health care is an arms-length process, patients are not treated like children. Yet, the Cheng article plainly shows doctors treating patients exactly as children with a presumed reduced capacity to understand and no self-enforceable rights. This quote is classic: "'You could tell those patients that this is something that doesn't have any medicine in it but has been shown to work in people with your condition,' he suggested." "Those patients" would be, what, total morons? It would have been helpful if Cheng would have interviewed a few medical ethicists and lawyers instead of practioners and psychiatrists. Truly an appalling situation.