Jump to content



Photo

So you really think Global Warming is not a hoax ?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 nimblebear

nimblebear

    Welcome to the Dark Side !

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 6,062 posts

Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:37 AM

As I've said all along Gore and his fellow dimwits who talk about manmade global warming are full of baloney.

Here is more evidence they are full of so much crapola !

I will post more evidence as the year goes on, but suffice it to say we will be putting a nail in this coffin very soon. (thank gawd)

Science
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979
Michael Asher - January 1, 2009 11:31 AM

Thirty years of sea ice data. The record begins at 1979, the year satellite observations began (Source: Arctic Research Center, University of Illinois)Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.

Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close.

Ice levels had been tracking lower throughout much of 2008, but rapidly recovered in the last quarter. In fact, the rate of increase from September onward is the fastest rate of change on record, either upwards or downwards.

The data is being reported by the University of Illinois's Arctic Climate Research Center, and is derived from satellite observations of the Northern and Southern hemisphere polar regions.

Each year, millions of square kilometers of sea ice melt and refreeze. However, the mean ice anomaly -- defined as the seasonally-adjusted difference between the current value and the average from 1979-2000, varies much more slowly. That anomaly now stands at just under zero, a value identical to one recorded at the end of 1979, the year satellite record-keeping began.

Sea ice is floating and, unlike the massive ice sheets anchored to bedrock in Greenland and Antarctica, doesn't affect ocean levels. However, due to its transient nature, sea ice responds much faster to changes in temperature or precipitation and is therefore a useful barometer of changing conditions.

Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008. Instead, the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. Bill Chapman, a researcher with the UIUC's Arctic Center, tells DailyTech this was due in part to colder temperatures in the region. Chapman says wind patterns have also been weaker this year. Strong winds can slow ice formation as well as forcing ice into warmer waters where it will melt.

Why were predictions so wrong? Researchers had expected the newer sea ice, which is thinner, to be less resilient and melt easier. Instead, the thinner ice had less snow cover to insulate it from the bitterly cold air, and therefore grew much faster than expected, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

In May, concerns over disappearing sea ice led the U.S. to officially list the polar bear a threatened species, over objections from experts who claimed the animal's numbers were increasing.

Edited by nimblebear, 05 January 2009 - 11:38 AM.

OTIS.

#2 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:45 AM

I beat you to it.
But we put this stuff in the "Sanity and Health" board.

dailytech.com
Science
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979

Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.
January 1, 2009
Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979
also drew to a close. Ice levels had been tracking lower throughout much of 2008, but rapidly recovered in the last quarter.
In fact, the rate of increase from September onward is the fastest rate of change on record, either upwards or downwards.

The data is being reported by the University of Illinois's Arctic Climate Research Center, and is derived
from satellite observations of the Northern and Southern hemisphere polar regions.

Rogerdodger asks: Could near record lows of sun spot activity have had an effect on the earth?
See: Sunspots to vanish within 10 years Sun Makes History: First Spotless Month in a Century





#3 zoropb

zoropb

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 8,392 posts

Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:59 AM

As I've said all along Gore and his fellow dimwits who talk about manmade global warming are full of baloney.

Here is more evidence they are full of so much crapola !

I will post more evidence as the year goes on, but suffice it to say we will be putting a nail in this coffin very soon. (thank gawd)

Science
Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979
Michael Asher - January 1, 2009 11:31 AM

Thirty years of sea ice data. The record begins at 1979, the year satellite observations began (Source: Arctic Research Center, University of Illinois)Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.

Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close.

Ice levels had been tracking lower throughout much of 2008, but rapidly recovered in the last quarter. In fact, the rate of increase from September onward is the fastest rate of change on record, either upwards or downwards.

The data is being reported by the University of Illinois's Arctic Climate Research Center, and is derived from satellite observations of the Northern and Southern hemisphere polar regions.

Each year, millions of square kilometers of sea ice melt and refreeze. However, the mean ice anomaly -- defined as the seasonally-adjusted difference between the current value and the average from 1979-2000, varies much more slowly. That anomaly now stands at just under zero, a value identical to one recorded at the end of 1979, the year satellite record-keeping began.

Sea ice is floating and, unlike the massive ice sheets anchored to bedrock in Greenland and Antarctica, doesn't affect ocean levels. However, due to its transient nature, sea ice responds much faster to changes in temperature or precipitation and is therefore a useful barometer of changing conditions.

Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008. Instead, the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. Bill Chapman, a researcher with the UIUC's Arctic Center, tells DailyTech this was due in part to colder temperatures in the region. Chapman says wind patterns have also been weaker this year. Strong winds can slow ice formation as well as forcing ice into warmer waters where it will melt.

Why were predictions so wrong? Researchers had expected the newer sea ice, which is thinner, to be less resilient and melt easier. Instead, the thinner ice had less snow cover to insulate it from the bitterly cold air, and therefore grew much faster than expected, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

In May, concerns over disappearing sea ice led the U.S. to officially list the polar bear a threatened species, over objections from experts who claimed the animal's numbers were increasing.


For me it is all about the big guy in the sky and the ball we are on regulating temps. But give some credit to those pro warming folks they have been correct some what we been warming for about 25,000 years. It is a nice issue to keep the minds off the real problems going on.

Z

Love, be kind to one another, seek the truth, walk the narrow path between the ying and the yang.


#4 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 05 January 2009 - 02:27 PM

Wouldn't it be surprising to find that the weather, which is dominated by daily cycles as well as annual seasonal cycles, also has much larger cycles at work. Some of which are still unknown. Most of which are still unknown.

Edited by Rogerdodger, 05 January 2009 - 02:29 PM.