Bradley Cowan
#1
Posted 25 June 2013 - 08:05 AM
"Four and a half years ago, Cowan published Pentagonal Time Cycle Theory where he presented his independently discovered market cycle equation, based on the Square of Twelve. He used that equation, anchored 50 years in the past, to project the two cycle top dates shown below. In December, 2012 owners of CycleTimer software received his Market Forecast, which again forecast these exact dates as the top. That same newsletter included WD Gann's PricexDegree of the Moon's North Node used as price target. When these cycles and resistance lines met, circled below, the top was reached in both price and time."
#2
Posted 25 June 2013 - 08:15 AM
klh
#3
Posted 25 June 2013 - 08:28 AM
#4
Posted 25 June 2013 - 08:36 AM
#5
Posted 25 June 2013 - 08:41 AM
Nearly two years before the recent stock market top (edit May 2011) Cowan published its expected date in Pentagonal Time Cycle Theory ...This cycle has special pentagonal significance only explained in Cowan's latest book. This cycle is due to return again in 2013 with even more profound consequences."
Lines like "Moon's North Node" and "Pentagonal Time Cycle..." immediately reeks of dung, a pile of it...
#6
Posted 25 June 2013 - 08:41 AM
Nearly two years before the recent stock market top (edit May 2011) Cowan published its expected date in Pentagonal Time Cycle Theory ...This cycle has special pentagonal significance only explained in Cowan's latest book. This cycle is due to return again in 2013 with even more profound consequences."
Retrot: What does he see as the bottom? What are his predictions for the rest of this year? Thanks.
#8
Posted 25 June 2013 - 08:58 AM
Lines like "Moon's North Node" and "Pentagonal Time Cycle..." immediately reeks of dung, a pile of it...
#9
Posted 25 June 2013 - 09:27 AM
Venatici's outstanding contributions to this forum
Lines like "Moon's North Node" and "Pentagonal Time Cycle..." immediately reeks of dung, a pile of it...
Fair enough. I understand your point.
I did not meant to criticize your person but that specific content you posted. And I maintain my view, the content posted at the link you show is worthless. It mixes bible quotations, vaguely mistic references with astrology (?). Yes enough said.
As for me, I never claimed to add amazing content to this forum.
Best regards,
#10
Posted 25 June 2013 - 09:45 AM
...my focus is on the book Pentagonal Time Cycle Theory not the website...obviously you missed the point...it is always interesting when one can rationalize criticism without reviewing or understanding the very substance of the matter he is critical of...