Natural alternatives to Viagra?
#11
Posted 17 September 2007 - 12:32 PM
#12
Posted 17 September 2007 - 12:51 PM
Truth is an open book. Real medicine, real science is universal and available to anyone.
Anyone who is claiming to have a "secret" formula or "private" cure is full of baloney. I am only stating the obvious.
It is okay to have different opinions. Share them, debate them, show your data, show your proof. If you cannot defend, scientifically, a scientific point, then I would suggest that point is false.
Anyone who has taken the responsiblity of someone else's health must be held accountable. What one does for themself is entirely different. Feel free to do as you please. BUT, if you are in a position of telling other people about their LIFE and their BODY, you must take that responsiblity seriously and be willing to disclose your data and subject your diagnosis and treatment to open scrutiny.
mm
#13
Posted 17 September 2007 - 07:51 PM
#14
Posted 17 September 2007 - 08:02 PM
I stood in a line 1 1/2 hours last week for a free screening. PSA and DRE.
Don't know what to think about it.
Why is the PSA test controversial in screening? Using the PSA test to screen men for prostate cancer is controversial because it is not yet known if this test actually saves lives. Moreover, it is not clear if the benefits of PSA screening outweigh the risks of follow-up diagnostic tests and cancer treatments. For example, the PSA test may detect small cancers that would never become life threatening. This situation, called overdiagnosis, puts men at risk for complications from unnecessary treatment such as surgery or radiation.
The procedure used to diagnose prostate cancer (prostate biopsy) may cause side effects, including bleeding and infection. Prostate cancer treatment may cause incontinence (inability to control urine flow) and erectile dysfunction (erections inadequate for intercourse). For these reasons, it is important that the benefits and risks of diagnostic procedures and treatment be taken into account when considering whether to undertake prostate cancer screening.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#15
Posted 17 September 2007 - 08:02 PM
Edited by SemiBizz, 17 September 2007 - 08:03 PM.
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#16
Posted 17 September 2007 - 08:46 PM
psa screening caused untold numbers of uneccesary biopsys till they came up with free psa analysis......and as far as the removal of the prostate.......the new davinci robotic and other robotics like VIP eliminats the problems with impotence, bleeding, erections and all the other problems associated with the old style of removal....Good Luck Cheif.
I stood in a line 1 1/2 hours last week for a free screening. PSA and DRE.
Don't know what to think about it.
Why is the PSA test controversial in screening? Using the PSA test to screen men for prostate cancer is controversial because it is not yet known if this test actually saves lives. Moreover, it is not clear if the benefits of PSA screening outweigh the risks of follow-up diagnostic tests and cancer treatments. For example, the PSA test may detect small cancers that would never become life threatening. This situation, called overdiagnosis, puts men at risk for complications from unnecessary treatment such as surgery or radiation.
The procedure used to diagnose prostate cancer (prostate biopsy) may cause side effects, including bleeding and infection. Prostate cancer treatment may cause incontinence (inability to control urine flow) and erectile dysfunction (erections inadequate for intercourse). For these reasons, it is important that the benefits and risks of diagnostic procedures and treatment be taken into account when considering whether to undertake prostate cancer screening.
http://healthlink.mc...1018800849.html
http://www.malecare....e-cancer_77.htm
#17
Posted 17 September 2007 - 09:05 PM
#18
Posted 17 September 2007 - 09:17 PM
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#19
Posted 17 September 2007 - 10:11 PM
#20
Posted 17 September 2007 - 10:31 PM
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics