UNG - too tempting to pass up
#21
Posted 31 March 2009 - 01:08 PM
#22
Posted 31 March 2009 - 01:12 PM
The outstanding problem is the possibility of a 25% decline to the $3 level. Check out what happened in 2001 when it made a final multi-week plunge to what's now the trendline, and note how that move didn't even register on the macd or stochastic; a nice positive divergence, but quite a cost. For those position traders here, what will be your position if we begun that final decline? Will you hold through a loss of 25%?
-MK
Yeah and that's the same thing many hombres said when crude OIL was at 35-40, that "it was going to 25". Anything is possible eh amigo? I'll take the risk/reward of buying here and that its not going to $3. That's why they pay me the BIG PESOS!
Pure unadulterated BS
Senor
#23
Posted 31 March 2009 - 02:05 PM
#24
Posted 31 March 2009 - 02:09 PM
The outstanding problem is the possibility of a 25% decline to the $3 level. Check out what happened in 2001 when it made a final multi-week plunge to what's now the trendline, and note how that move didn't even register on the macd or stochastic; a nice positive divergence, but quite a cost. For those position traders here, what will be your position if we begun that final decline? Will you hold through a loss of 25%?
-MK
Yeah and that's the same thing many hombres said when crude OIL was at 35-40, that "it was going to 25". Anything is possible eh amigo? I'll take the risk/reward of buying here and that its not going to $3. That's why they pay me the BIG PESOS!
Pure unadulterated BS
Senor
dharma
#25
Posted 31 March 2009 - 02:21 PM
#26
Posted 31 March 2009 - 02:32 PM
that was jim rogers!Some guy on squawk box just told Maria B. to get a tractor because agriculture is the next sure thing. I just got off my Kubota. What a hoot. Out of real estate and into trading and training horses. Ye haw.
dharma
#27
Posted 31 March 2009 - 02:59 PM
The outstanding problem is the possibility of a 25% decline to the $3 level. Check out what happened in 2001 when it made a final multi-week plunge to what's now the trendline, and note how that move didn't even register on the macd or stochastic; a nice positive divergence, but quite a cost. For those position traders here, what will be your position if we begun that final decline? Will you hold through a loss of 25%?
-MK
Yeah and that's the same thing many hombres said when crude OIL was at 35-40, that "it was going to 25". Anything is possible eh amigo? I'll take the risk/reward of buying here and that its not going to $3. That's why they pay me the BIG PESOS!
Pure unadulterated BS
Senor
And the answer to the question is...? Hold on a break to $3?
-MK
#28
Posted 31 March 2009 - 03:07 PM
Cant tell you now. Have to see how the charts look then. Trading positions eh? It is just not a mans world anymore. Get back to you on that. I just couldn't resist. Cheers. You are a great trading buddy.
Swan, I've always thought of myself as a multi-position kind of guy...
-MK
#29
Posted 31 March 2009 - 03:23 PM
Edited by Mike, 31 March 2009 - 03:25 PM.
#30
Posted 31 March 2009 - 07:53 PM
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!