1.7 TRIN, 1.3 Russell TRIN
#21
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:42 AM
#22
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:49 AM
Edited by einscodek, 17 January 2013 - 11:50 AM.
#23
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:01 PM
Just another piece of technical data that escapes you as to its application.If we are correcting on the fly, TRIN goes to 1.8?
Distribution only comes if the A/D line is diverging...it's not.There is distribution in every bit of advance... Amazing...
Any topping process can longer than what you believe to be that same expectation...that's why their formations tend to be rounding.Topping process can take weeks and will fool many...
You can keep fighting the trend if you wish, but how much money are you willing to lose in the process?
Fib
Fib - The market has, in my work, changed since the 2011 low with two failures of the summation to achieve generated price targets as such the overall bullish case of the NH generated in the cumulative NYAD becomes suspect. Summation needs another 3 step advance (would be third since '11 low) and help from 'third time is a charm'. Strong resistance 1494 as final bull target, since the last two internal summation targets failed (by my work) I doubt the final bull target is achieved.
NYSIT
#24
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:08 PM
DamnDamnDamn --Then I'm going to change this up...see you in April.We know this.. when market is going up Fib is bullish. When market is topping Fib is hyperactive , when market declines Fib is nowhere to be seen
Fib
I see the trolls have run Fib off again just as the NYMO appears to be turning up again and broad indexes, like the SPX and RUT, are breaking to new highs as he's been suggesting all along, and even the Naz Comp is trying to come up out of its bull flag (despite the AAPL contagion), and just at the moment I'm wanting a real expert's opinion (trolls, by that I mean Fib's) on whether or not that's a true inverse head-and-shoulders in the SPX measuring to north of 1600 or not.
There is difference between a bearish opinion and a foolish opinion but obviously there are fools here who do not have the slightest idea there is such a the difference.
Edited by diogenes227, 17 January 2013 - 12:09 PM.
"If you've heard this story before, don't stop me because I'd like to hear it again," Groucho Marx (on market history?).
“I've learned in options trading simple is best and the obvious is often the most elusive to recognize.”
"The god of trading rewards persistence, experience and discipline, and absolutely nothing else."
#25
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:27 PM
DamnDamnDamn --
I see the trolls have run Fib off again just as the NYMO appears to be turning up again and broad indexes, like the SPX and RUT, are breaking to new highs as he's been suggesting all along, and even the Naz Comp is trying to come up out of its bull flag (despite the AAPL contagion), and just at the moment I'm wanting a real expert's opinion (trolls, by that I mean Fib's) on whether or not that's a true inverse head-and-shoulders in the SPX measuring to north of 1600 or not.
There is difference between a bearish opinion and a foolish opinion but obviously there are fools here who do not have the slightest idea there is such a the difference.
Keep down the abuse, diogenes. Don't get frustrated.
Everyone who contradicted Fib on this thread have posted real time trades (entry and exit both) except you and Fib. That is alright if you cannot post entry and exit but don't abuse us because it is not working for you. Please diogenes.
Please keep your frustrations to yourself.
#26
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:34 PM
#27
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:38 PM
#28
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:53 PM
DamnDamnDamn --Then I'm going to change this up...see you in April.We know this.. when market is going up Fib is bullish. When market is topping Fib is hyperactive , when market declines Fib is nowhere to be seen
Fib
I see the trolls have run Fib off again just as the NYMO appears to be turning up again and broad indexes, like the SPX and RUT, are breaking to new highs as he's been suggesting all along, and even the Naz Comp is trying to come up out of its bull flag (despite the AAPL contagion), and just at the moment I'm wanting a real expert's opinion (trolls, by that I mean Fib's) on whether or not that's a true inverse head-and-shoulders in the SPX measuring to north of 1600 or not.
There is difference between a bearish opinion and a foolish opinion but obviously there are fools here who do not have the slightest idea there is such a the difference.
I don't think anyone can run Fib off. Overall, some post might be troll-like but sometimes it is just a little friendly ribbing.
And I think Fib will be posting again well before April.
17_16
#29
Posted 17 January 2013 - 01:02 PM
[
I see the trolls have run Fib off again just as the NYMO appears to be turning up again and broad indexes, like the SPX and RUT, are breaking to new highs as he's been suggesting all along, and even the Naz Comp is trying to come up out of its bull flag
if indeed you trust his escape velocity thesis, there is no reason to be so miffed..you are welcome to join the party as the implication is bery bery bullish. On the other hand......
#30
Posted 17 January 2013 - 01:10 PM
Edited by arbman, 17 January 2013 - 01:12 PM.