490 replies to this topic

[Rogerdodger]

Follow the money to the real truth: MORE TAXES NEEDED  to save us all.

Meat tax to fight 'climate change'...

 

Remember the Window Tax?

Many people in Britain opposed income tax, on principle, because the disclosure of personal income represented an unacceptable governmental intrusion into private matters, and a potential threat to personal liberty. In fact the first permanent British income tax was not introduced until 1842, and the issue remained intensely controversial well into the 20th century. When the window tax was introduced, it consisted of two parts: a flat-rate house tax of 2 shillings per house (equivalent to £12.51 in 2015), and a variable tax for the number of windows above ten windows in the house. Properties with between ten and twenty windows paid an extra four shillings (equivalent to £25.03 in 2015), and those above twenty windows paid an extra eight shillings (equivalent to £50.06 in 2015)

Edited by Rogerdodger, 27 April 2016 - 12:03 PM.

[Rogerdodger]

Who cares? The riches have been made on the selling of fear.

 

An Inconvenient Review: Years Later, Gore Film Alarmingly Inaccurate...

 

Gore’s claim is more hype than actual science, since storms aren’t more extreme since 2006. In fact, not even findings from the United Nations’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) support Gore’s claim.

The IPCC found in 2013 there “is limited evidence of changes in extremes associated with other climate variables since the mid-20th century.” The IPCC also found “no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century” and “[n]o robust trends in annual numbers of tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes counts have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin.”

 

Edited by Rogerdodger, 04 May 2016 - 11:09 PM.

[diogenes227]

FORT McMURRAY AND THE FIRES OF CLIMATE CHANGE

 

From the link:

 

 

All of this brings us to what one commentator referred to as “the black irony” of the fire that has destroyed most of Fort McMurray.

 

The town exists to get at the tar sands, and the tar sands produce a particularly carbon-intensive form of fuel. (The fight over the Keystone XL pipeline is, at its heart, a fight over whether the U.S. should be encouraging —or, if you prefer, profiting from—the exploitation of the tar sands.) The more carbon that goes into the atmosphere, the warmer the world will get, and the more likely we are to see devastating fires like the one now raging.

 

To raise environmental concerns in the midst of human tragedy is to risk the charge of insensitivity. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alluded to this danger at a recent news conference: “Any time we try to make a political argument out of one particular disaster, I think there’s a bit of a shortcut that can sometimes not have the desired outcome.” And certainly it would be wrong to blame the residents of Fort McMurray for the disaster that has befallen them. As Andrew Weaver, a Canadian climate scientist who is a Green Party member of British Columbia’s provincial legislature, noted, “The reality is we are all consumers of products that come from oil.”

But to fail to acknowledge the connection is to risk another kind of offense. We are all consumers of oil, not to mention coal and natural gas, which means that we’ve all contributed to the latest inferno. We need to own up to our responsibility, and then we need to do something about it. The fire next time is one that we’ve been warned about, and that we’ve all had a hand in starting.

 

[Rogerdodger]

There's really nothing new under the Sun...

 

It seems that most of the preoccupation of the Aztecs had to do with fear of the nature, and a fear of the end of the world.

In 1450 be a terrible famine caused by flooding.(CLIMATE CHANGE)

To placate the gods the Aztecs made human sacrifices in ever-increasing numbers.

The Aztecs believed they lived in the age of the last or 5th sun which would destroy humanity.

Among the shocks to the Spanish were the racks on which thousands of skulls were displayed.

The city was interlaced with thousand of canals used for transportation. There were zoos with plants and animals for all over the empire. Long causeways joined the city to the shores. Garbage and waste were carried away by barges, and most people bathed once a day.

http://mexicanhistory.org/aztec.htm

 

But they thought they could save the environment with sacrifice.

Sounds so familiar, doesn't it?

 

200 years later Galileo denied that the earth was flat.

He was imprisoned for being a "denier."

Edited by Rogerdodger, 08 May 2016 - 10:34 PM.

[Rogerdodger]

"Scientific" forecasts of the future:

 

BIG BLOW: Why forecasters were off on Hermine's path...

 

On average, the errors in forecasting a storm’s location increase by 40 to 50 nautical miles for every day in advance of the point in time that is being predicted, said James L. Franklin, a meteorologist at the National Hurricane Center in Miami.

 

Likewise...

 

Climate Forecasts

For decades they said we would all be dead and underwater by now.

[diogenes227]

I knew you guys would love this so I'm posting it as a public service to you:

 

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S POST WHITE-HOUSE PLANS

[Rogerdodger]

2016 "HOTTEST YEAR ON RECORD" (after previous records were "adjusted" down.)

 

But those fuel-guzzling-private-jet-flying G20 Elites don't seem to care, now that real problems are appearing.

 

Anxiety spikes among G-20, an analysis of UN speeches shows...

 

 

[Rogerdodger]

Climate Change is good! (It's been changing since the beginning of time!)
Plants LOVE CO2!
CROP BOOM: Record Corn, Soybeans, Wheat...

 

Global Warming be Damned: Record Corn, Soybeans, Wheat

[Rogerdodger]

Changing Climate or changing facts and definitions?

 

It was so cute when they "adjusted" previous temperature records down so that current temperatures could be called RECORD HEAT!

 

But now they will re-define what a hurricane is.

 

Warming Alarmists Redefine What A Hurricane Is So We'll Have More Of Them

Eleven years ago, Gore swore that "the science is extremely clear now." Global warming was "magnifying" the "destructive power" of the "average hurricane," he said. Man's impact on the environment "makes the duration, as well as the intensity of the hurricane, stronger."

The weather refused to cooperate with Gore and the U.S. went 11 years without a hurricane making landfall. But Hurricane Matthew renewed the alarmists' faith in their own nonsense, acting is if 11 days rather than 11 years had passed.

 

If the intensity of a storm is redefined, the game changes.

 

;-)

Edited by Rogerdodger, 17 October 2016 - 03:37 PM.

[Rogerdodger]

Did you know that "Adjustments" in history can make it warmer today?

(Even though the Vikings still have not returned to frozen Greenland.)

 

Have you considered the real motive behind the fraud?

 

• More On The NOAA Texas Temperature Fraud
• Spreading The Word About Climate Fraud In Texas

 

The bottom right chart displays that downward revisions have been made in older records...curious, isn't it?

Edited by Rogerdodger, 18 October 2016 - 09:24 AM.