Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’
... Citing extensive data (pdf) to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in
physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric
science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the
EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political
opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong.
“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion,
models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is
commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and
Mr. Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none
provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.”
“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific
method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific
method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic
warming and extreme weather.” ...
https://www.theepoch...Nhg7ycH5owS0%3D