Jump to content


Investors in Gilead, first due diligence

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 dowdeva



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 507 posts

Posted 17 May 2020 - 07:04 PM

Well, it gets even more interesting than my DOCTOR friend said. Seems like Gilead had  the rights to fast track the drug for marketing due to a clause in licensing due to national emergencies, and WALKED AWAY from such an opportunity to quickly end such a 'crises' to seek a patent with guess, who?


Wuxi Pharmaceuticals in China owned by the famous altruist and philanthropist, George Soros, who also happens to own - Gilead Sciences.







Interesting how this article doesn't come up in a Google search, don't you think? 


But then people like pdx, the 80 Year Old Golf Champion et alia will take online articles like this from USA Today as the  holy Bible notwithstanding that anything stated as a 'fact'  in the USA article is not supported with any documentation. unlike the article from 'Civilian Intelligence Network'.


Have any of you emailed USA Today demanding they do due diligence and supply documentation for their absurd 'Fact Checks'? Do you know you have been entrained for almost your whole lifetime to take everything a major newspaper says as the truth?


Doesn't it raise any warning signals for any of you out there at all that everything you read on the web these days is an imitation of everything else? I remember even five years ago you would get differing opinions on a subject during web search.


"...You don’t have any other society where the educated classes are so effectively indoctrinated and controlled by a subtle propaganda system – a private system including media, intellectual opinion forming magazines and the participation of the most highly educated sections of the population. Such people ought to be referred to as “Commissars” – for that is what their essential function is – to set up and maintain a system of doctrines and beliefs which will undermine independent thought and prevent a proper understanding and analysis of national and global institutions, issues, and policies...."


Noam Chomsky


More to come.




Below is the article from USA Today. Each 'fact' is a one, two or three liner statement (of opinion):









Edited by dowdeva, 17 May 2020 - 07:12 PM.

#2 dowdeva



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 507 posts

Posted 17 May 2020 - 07:21 PM

Almost forgot, Diogenes, you mentioned that the Clintons live down the street from you.


First, WOW! You must live in a nice neighborhood! Stock market been veddy veddy good to you, eh?


However, out of concern for you I must give you a heads up: If you are ever invited to one of their parties and  Hilary Clinton's good friend John Podesta is there with his current hottie, Marina Abramovic, run for the hills!

Edited by dowdeva, 17 May 2020 - 07:22 PM.

#3 Iblayz



  • TT Patron+
  • 966 posts

Posted 17 May 2020 - 10:23 PM

Don't get discouraged Dowdeva. Not all of us have bought into this lunacy lock, stock and barrel. And all of us do NOT believe that most of the anointed and saintly voices that have been advising us are in fact "saintly". In fact, some of us, who read a lot and always seem to "read between the lines", believe that some of the most prominent voices whose advice led us down this stupid path, are seriously compromised and, if they were cops, would be called "dirty cops". As you might imagine, I am one of those people. That doesn't mean that I don't realize that, for some, this was a very serious issue. But to shut down businesses, to order people to stay home, to jeopardize everything some people have worked for, to shatter the hopes and dreams of hundreds of thousands of people, AND TO WALK ALL OVER OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS........nah, there's a LOT that doesn't pass the smell test.

#4 dwnowhere1



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 54 posts

Posted 18 May 2020 - 08:17 AM



Like most things in life, the question is:

Where do you draw the line, and how tight is the shoe you are wearing?

If one has No social responsibility – concern for others – then one might argue:

I can do what I want, when I want, and you can’t tell me any different.

However that voice changes when yourself, or ones loved ones are personally affected.

As long as it is the other guy is bearing the cost, it is easy to only be concerned about ones self.

Sadly, IMHO, we have a person in the White House who is - what I call -  “Get a Bigger Hammer Guy”.
He’s the type that tries to fit a square peg in a round hole.  If it does Not fit, he keeps using a bigger hammer to make it fit.

Once he gets it in, he proclaims he was right, it was a perfect fit.  Now some people accept his explanation on face value.   Others not.

I’m in the Not camp, and believe the data needs to govern.

I don’t know what the right balance is, but going with what the data says. IMHO, will give us the best solution.


Edited by dwnowhere1, 18 May 2020 - 08:26 AM.

#5 dowdeva



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 507 posts

Posted 18 May 2020 - 09:39 AM

Thanks, Iblayz, your kindness is much appreciated.


 It's not Trump. He is just doing what he is told. it's a conspiracy (not conspiracy theory) of a cabal of  the richest to transfer wealth to themselves and render us helpless and hopeless and eventual slaves or prisoners, or dead. I have provided links and due diligence ad infinitum.


Empires do end.


And while this is happening, right in front of us, we have a nation full of fully indoctrinated, well off intellectuals who have a few million dollars, thinking that will be enough to save us from the deluge.




“The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.”



"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
     Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.


Martin Niemoller 

#6 dwnowhere1



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 54 posts

Posted 18 May 2020 - 09:54 AM



Just of few minutes of research turned up this:




It appears neither Soros nor Gates have an interest -- or if they do, it can't be much of one.

Check out the board and major shareholders.


Hopefully you saw "Meet the Press"  yesterday.  

Had a guy on who discussed how serious the spread of all this mis-information is,  and how it spreads (spark, flame, gasoline).

You might be able to listen to it online.

For me personally, I give -- ZERO -- credibility to the publication you cite.

Edited by dwnowhere1, 18 May 2020 - 09:57 AM.

#7 dowdeva



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 507 posts

Posted 18 May 2020 - 10:01 AM

He may have sold them after the article came out, which was dated in February. I will try to find out if and when he sold them.

#8 K Wave

K Wave


  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,664 posts

Posted 18 May 2020 - 10:30 AM

The only thing provably true is that the Gates Foundation is a really big donor UNITAID, to the tune of hundreds of millions.


But a simple search of Soros fund 13F reveals the he no longer owns any GILD, nor the WuXi





UNITAID does indeed do patent sharing arrangements with their MPP, and GILD is heavily involved, but Remdesivir not currently listed.

Here is a link to the UNITAID PDF of their approach to IP for anyone that cares to do a deep dive.



And here is a current listing of all of GILD patents in the MPP




"Clintongroup Inc" appears to have nothing to do with the those "Clintons"



Those are some actual facts. Make of them what you will.


My personal take is that guy is of full of S**t




What A Beautiful Black Sky

#9 Iblayz



  • TT Patron+
  • 966 posts

Posted 18 May 2020 - 10:32 AM

Just for the record, and so NO ONE misunderstands, my post had nothing to do with Trump. Nothing. His name did not enter my mind. Just amazing that some of the "reliable voices" whose advice led us down this loony path have been involved with and connected to big money funding and behind the scenes patents for vaccines for the very thing that they are now being relied on "for expert advice".





#10 dowdeva



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 507 posts

Posted 18 May 2020 - 11:03 AM

dwnowhere1 and kwave,


He sure did own them in February and Wuxi also. Here's from the SEC February filing:


GILEAD SCIENCES INC COM 375558103 $ 58,428 1,375,736 SH SOLE 


Yes, he sold the shares (and Wuxi), Totally different from never owning them. THAT IS IMPORTANT.  Somewhere between the time he owned them in February and the next quarterly statement. And during that time it went to ninety dollars per share from seventy dollars per share.


Thereby making him over million dollars in one month on GILD alone on frenzied news regarding the company


And don't you find even more reprehensible that he marked up the shares with the help of the media and sold them, AFTER he (GILD) walked away from immediately choosing to help people suffering with Corona virus (which was made in a stinky lab just down the street) , in order to seek a patent with Wuxi Pharmaceuticals, which coincidentally, he also no longer owns?


Why would he do something like that, with the opportunity to make even more money than he did through selling the shares, if the medicine can help cure a PANDEMIC? You know, pandemic?  Like the plague? Millions of people suffering and sick? You know why? Well, I'll tell you why. There is no pandemic, the market for the drug is minuscule and even so, the drug probably is a piece of junk.


Remember, GILD could have immediately marketed this 'amazing' drug through a clause in licensing procedure for drugs if an emergency conditions are present in the world.


Fact: Since March there have been no insider buys on GILD


Projection: Watch the stock tank.


Fact: I am going to short the heck out of this stinker that Soros has been trading in and out of since 2010.

Edited by dowdeva, 18 May 2020 - 11:11 AM.