My analysis and comments submitted to Oregon OSHA last week. Sorry if some of the hyperlinks don't work when pasting text here.
To: Department of Consumer and Business Services/Oregon OSHA
PO BOX 14480
Salem OR 97309-0405
Submitted via Email – firstname.lastname@example.org
CC: Matthew Kaiser, Central Office, Matthew.C.Kaiser@oregon.gov
Re: Comments on OSHA’s Proposed Permanent Rule - OAR 437-001-0744
I am writing to convey and document my concerns and strong opposition to OSHA’s proposed permanent rule: OAR 437-001-0744. There is no reasonable or rational justification for creating this permanent rule, and the note attached to the public notice about intending to rescind the rule at some undefined point in the future is no solace to informed citizens that oppose the provisions of this rule.
Some of us recall that the lockdowns were only going to be two weeks to “flatten the curve”. Here we are more than a year later and many restrictions are still in place, and now there’s a proposal to extend COVID 19 restrictions with a permanent rule in Oregon. Many states across the country have reduced or entirely eliminated the restrictions while their reported COVID “cases” and deaths have continued to decline. Some areas like South Dakota and the entire country of Sweden did not buy into the mandatory lockdown, masks and social distancing agenda. Their infection and mortality rates have been similar to, if not lower than their neighbors, while their respective economies and employment levels have remained strong throughout the “pandemic”.
The entire premise that COVID-19 is an ongoing public health emergency is deeply flawed and not based on science or objective analysis of the data. Perhaps the initial overreaction in 2020 could be blamed to some extent on the media’s lockstep relentless fear and propaganda campaign and lack of data at the time. However, now that we have data and clear evidence and admissions of over-counting cases and over-attributing deaths to COVID (due in large part to huge financial incentives provided for COVID cases and deaths), it’s time for an honest and objective reassessment without pressure from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Whitehouse, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or senior government officials in Oregon. All the fearmongering and over-reporting of COVID cases and deaths has turned a lot of non-critical thinking people into neurotic, Howard Hughes-level germaphobes and hypochondriacs.
Any actions taken by government in response to a perceived public health threat must factor in and weigh the consequences of those actions against the risks of the health threat as well as civil liberties and constitutional rights of the public. Given that we now know that COVID-19 has an overall death rate equal to or lower than typical season flu, there is absolutely no justification for continued restrictions that have caused -
- devastation of the economy and destruction of countless small and mid-size businesses in the state,
- skyrocketing unemployment, homelessness and hunger, and
- alarmingly high rates of depression, drug use and suicide, especially among the youth who have been forced to forego essential human contact and in-person socialization with friends, neighbors and fellow students (LINK).
The response to COVID-19 has been far worse than the disease, of which many people have no symptoms and have to be tested to find out if they have it. In a true pandemic, there would not be ongoing debate about whether it’s a pandemic or a “plandemic”. We would all have friends, family members and neighbors falling seriously ill and everyone would know there was a pandemic without nonstop fearmongering media to convince us. And we wouldn’t be censored or deplatformed for questioning the official narrative, because we wouldn’t be questioning it.
Continuing the COVID restrictions, or imposing them again in the future for COVID or any other virus or perceived health emergency, will raise serious questions and investigations about the motives (Event 201; Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030) of those issuing such orders, apparently without regard to collateral damage, infringement of constitutionally protected rights, and other impacts to the public and the economy.
Proposed OSHA Rule Conflicts with Applicable State, Federal and International Laws
State and local responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the lockdown orders, have effected takings (by destroying private businesses) without just compensation.
- The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation when the state meaningfully interferes with an owner’s chosen lawful use of his property.
- Oregon Statute also requires reasonable compensation for takings by the state due to an emergency.
ORS 431A.15 (2) (6) If property is taken under the authority granted to the Public Health Director under subsection (2) of this section, the owner of the property is entitled to reasonable compensation from the state. [Formerly 431.264]
Vaccines and Medical Experiments
While I am opposed to extending any of the COVID 19 restrictions, the most alarming and clearly unlawful part of the proposed permanent rule is regarding vaccines and the option for OHA to determine they are mandatory for employees.
In OSHA’s proposed rule, section (3) "COVID-19 Requirements for All Workplaces", it includes the following new subsection:
"(m) COVID-19 vaccination for workers.
(A)The employer must cooperate by making its employees and appropriate space available at no cost to the workers whenever a local public health agency or Oregon Health Authority indicate that COVID19 vaccination within the workplace is necessary.
(B)If such vaccination is conducted at the employer’s own direction, the employer is responsible for covering the costs of vaccination including but not limited to the employee time, and employee travel to vaccinated. However, if the employer does not request the vaccination, the employer is not expected to cover the direct cost of such vaccination or of any involved employee travel.
©Unless the local public health agency or Oregon Health Authority directs otherwise, employers need not require employees to accept the vaccination. If employees who are offered the vaccine decline to be vaccinated, the employer must document that declination.
Note: Oregon OSHA will provide model declination forms for use by employers in documenting such declination.
Note: It is the considered opinion of both the Oregon Health Authority and Oregon OSHA that all individuals should accept vaccination unless it is medically contra-indicated. Allowing some workers to decline such a vaccination does not indicate any doubts on the part of the state or Oregon about the value of the vaccine and the importance of reaching a high vaccination rate to both public and worker health."
In subsection (3)(m)© above, the phase “Unless the local public health agency or Oregon Health Authority directs otherwise” eliminates informed consent and effectively forces/coerces employees to accept vaccination if they want to work. Required vaccination (especially experimental EUA vaccines) is a violation of state, federal and international law. Oregon Statute
ORS 431A.15 clearly provides for the right of all persons to refuse vaccination based on medical contraindication, or on the basis of religious or conscientious objection as follows:
ORS 431A.15 (2) The Public Health Director, after making the determinations required under subsection (1) of this section, may take the following public health actions:
(d) Require a person to obtain treatment and use appropriate prophylactic measures to prevent the introduction or spread of a communicable disease or reportable disease, unless:
(A) The person has a medical diagnosis for which a vaccination is contraindicated; or
( The person has a religious or conscientious objection to the required treatments or prophylactic measures.
Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) - LINK
Coercing people to participate in a medical experiment is expressly prohibited under Section 1 of the 1947 Nuremberg Code -
- “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.”
The Nuremberg Code was promulgated following a series of trials for crimes against humanity in Germany, which included the Doctor’s Trials for medical experimentation.
PCR Tests: False Positives = False Pandemic
COVID-19 infections, or rather the positive test results that the PCR tests delivered, became the justification for relentless fearmongering by mainstream media (MSM), worldwide lockdowns and business closures, unprecedented quarantine of healthy people, social distancing and mandatory face masks. This is now being used to push vaccines and “vaccine passports” (effectively mandatory vaccines) in the US and around the world. The PCR test does not specifically diagnose any specific pathogen. It simply attempts to identify, through a series of amplification cycles, RNA fragments that may be from a corona type virus, which includes the common cold/rhinovirus. In other words, use of the PCR test to specifically diagnose COVID-19 is a fraudulent and misleading application of the test. See additional information about the invalidity of PCR tests in the Biggest Tort Case in History below.
For those who are uninformed or otherwise lack an awareness of history, the WHO and CDC have faked epidemics and pandemics to push vaccines in the past. Following are a few examples:
- 1976-77 Swine Flu – Personally, I was one of the many people that had a severe adverse reaction and received lifelong injury from the vaccine aggressively promoted as part of fearmongering campaign for this fake pandemic. Mike Wallace of 60 Minutes did a report on this fraud many years ago. It has been completely scrubbed from YouTube but can still be found on some independent video archive sites (LINK).
- 2009 Swine Flu - While information about this has been scrubbed from the Internet, a Forbes article from 2010 can still be found in the internet archive “WayBackMachine”: Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic. Following is an excerpt: “The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century." Investigative journalist Greg Reese posted a very informative but brief video report about the fraudulent activities of the WHO in the 2009 “pandemic” (LINK).
mRNA Vaccine Related Deaths and Injuries Reported in CDC and European Databases -
Per CDC DATA there is a 6000% Increase in Reported Vaccine Deaths 1st Quarter 2021 Compared to 1st Quarter 2020 (LINK).
While fear of COVID-19 infection and transmission is relentlessly pushed by MSM and governments around the world, information about mRNA vaccine injuries and deaths is not reported. In fact, such information is actively suppressed and censored (as “vaccine misinformation”) by Google, Twitter, Facebook and other Big Tech platforms. Any reports of celebrity deaths following vaccination (Hank Aaron, Marvin Hagler, Larry King, etc.) are adamantly denied as having any connection to the vaccine, even though the deaths occurred shortly after receiving the shots. In stark contrast, for over a year now, it seems nearly all deaths have been attributed to COVID-19 infection regardless of age, co-morbidities, heart attacks, or trauma such as car or motorcycle accidents, etc., which historically would have been listed as the cause of death. Reporting about deaths and injuries from the mRNA vaccines can only be found at a few independent news sites such as HealthImpactNews.com.
Established in 1990, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S.-licensed vaccines. VAERS is co-managed by the CDC and the FDA. VAERS data through 3/19/21 shows reports of 2,050 deaths and 44,606 injuries following the various COVID “Vaccines”. This includes 300+ deaths added in the latest week’s report – 16 deaths from the new J&J single dose shot which is also producing “COVID symptoms” (LINK). Historically, the events reported in VAERS are only a small fraction (estimated less than 10%) of the actual events because most don't get reported in VAERS (many people aren't even aware of the reporting system).
EudraVigilance is a European database designed for collecting reports of suspected side effects of drugs in European countries. Their report through March 20, 2021 shows 4,576 deaths and 199,213 injuries reported as adverse reactions to COVID-19 “Vaccines” (LINK).
Due to all the deaths, rare blood clots, neurological injuries, and other adverse events occurring around the world, many countries have suspended administration of some of the mRNA vaccines until additional research and testing can demonstrate safety and effectiveness (LINK).
And then there’s this: Top WHO scientist says vaccinated travelers should still quarantine, citing lack of evidence that COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission. (LINK)
Pending Litigation under the Nuremberg Code
- See Biggest Tort Case in History below
- “When the Human Guinea Pig Vaccine Takers Start Dying, It’s Straight To Nuremberg” (Link)
- “Lawyers Promise ‘Nuremberg Trials’ Against All Behind COVID Scam” (LINK)
- “Israelis Cry Out to the World to Stop Mandatory COVID Injections as Lawsuit is Filed in International Criminal Court Over Nuremberg Code Violation” (LINK)
The United States Government has prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned or executed Medical Doctors who have conducted medical experimentation in violation of the Nuremberg Code. Aiders and abettors of Nuremberg Crimes are equally guilty and have also been prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned or executed.
Biggest Tort Case in History
The German Corona Investigative Committee has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts since July 10, 2020. (LINK)
Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, one of the Committee members, has published his testimony which at the time of this writing has been viewed over 1.3 million people in the last 10 days. The conclusions of the committee are the following:
- The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
- It is:
- The biggest tort case ever
- The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
- Those responsible must be:
- Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
- Sued for civil damages
- There is no excess mortality in any country
- Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
- 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
- Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
- Autopsies showed:
- Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
- Almost all deaths were very old people
- Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
- US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
- Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
- Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
- Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
- Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
- Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
- Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
- Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
- Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
- The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
- PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
- A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
- Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
- The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
- The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
- The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
- Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
- Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
- German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
- Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
- No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
- Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
- Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
- Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
- Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
- Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
- Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
- The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
- There can be no talk of a second wave
- Injury and damage:
- Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
- Anti-corona measures have:
- Killed innumerable people
- Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
- Children are being taken away from their parents
- Children are traumatized en masse
- Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
- A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
- Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages
Online Petition Opposed to OSHA’s Rule Making
I fully support and have signed the online petition that opposes OSHA’s proposed rule OAR 437-001-0744. Please acknowledge and consider the concerns raised by these citizens of Oregon. As of 4/1/21, nearly 50,000 have signed:
The text of the petition is as follows:
“We strongly oppose Oregon OSHA’s Proposal on Rules Addressing the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency in All Oregon Workplaces
(437-001-0744 “Addressing COVID-19 Workplace Risks”)
1. No unelected public agency should be allowed “indefinite” authority over any facet of public life.
2. We dispute the assertion of a “public health emergency” in Oregon. Covid-19 has been shown
• to pose a serious risk only to the elderly and immuno-compromised population, with less risk to the young than ordinary influenza, with an overall case fatality rate of just .026,
• to be easily and inexpensively treatable especially at its early outpatient phase,
• to not be a continuing “pandemic” as falsely maintained by PCR testing, which its Nobel Prize winning inventor, Kary Mullis, has stated was designed as a research instrument and is not a valid tool for diagnosing disease.
3. These rules would continue to impose intrusive, burdensome and unnecessary reach of government into Oregon businesses, their employees, customer and client privacy, and customer freedoms to conduct commerce without government interference.
4. These intrusions would impose continuing record-keeping and other administrative burdens, limitations, and privacy invasions of indefinite duration on every business, public agency and institution involving direct customer, client or student contact.
5. Many randomized controlled trials have uniformly and conclusively shown that masks of any kind to not prevent viral transmission.
6. There is no epidemiological or other credible scientific evidence that touch avoidance and social distancing prevents viral transmission, and the 6-foot rule appears made up from thin air with no empirical foundation.
7. Several states such as Florida and countries such as Sweden that have declined mandatory lockdowns and other restrictive measures have infection and fatality rates no different than those that have smothered and destroyed countless businesses, and these more open jurisdictions have avoided the massive public health and mental health problems that economic strangulation causes.
8. There has been a mass exodus from states with draconian restrictions to more open states such as Florida. Oregon will undoubtedly suffer a comparable loss of business and tax revenues should this ridiculous rule be implemented. We have had enough!”
Edited by Kimston, 07 April 2021 - 09:25 PM.