Edited by .Blizzard, 19 March 2007 - 03:53 PM.
Bradley Model
Started by
.Blizzard
, Mar 19 2007 03:52 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 19 March 2007 - 03:52 PM
I know that predicts turning points and not the direction.....however... it seems quite possible
#2
Posted 19 March 2007 - 06:52 PM
i guess i've been watching too many NCCA games but dont you have the labels "LOW" and "HIGH" in the wrong places?..or is this done to make me look and feel even more stupid than i really am?
#3
Posted 19 March 2007 - 09:18 PM
3/20 would be a nice present indeed .........
I know that predicts turning points and not the direction.....however... it seems quite possible
#4
Posted 19 March 2007 - 10:19 PM
[quote name='mikehb' date='Mar 19 2007, 07:52 PM' post='278094']
i guess i've been watching too many NCCA games but dont you have the labels "LOW" and "HIGH" in the wrong places?..or is this done to make me look and feel even more stupid than i really am?
[/quotes
SHHHHHHHH! or you know who will be back whining about how everybody steals his upside down charts. ;)
anybody want to make a little wager both the March 20 and Apr 20 dates are both highs?
i guess i've been watching too many NCCA games but dont you have the labels "LOW" and "HIGH" in the wrong places?..or is this done to make me look and feel even more stupid than i really am?
[/quotes
SHHHHHHHH! or you know who will be back whining about how everybody steals his upside down charts. ;)
anybody want to make a little wager both the March 20 and Apr 20 dates are both highs?
Edited by slupert, 19 March 2007 - 10:20 PM.
#5
Posted 19 March 2007 - 10:24 PM
The 9th, and 12th were highs over 1405.
The 13th & 14th were lows under 1380.
The Bradley was in between on the 10th.
So was it a high or a low?
Add a 3 day window and this discussion could bring back IYB!
Looks like 3/10 was a high and 3/20 could also be a high.
Especially if we get a high by the 21st or a low thereafter.
Edited by Rogerdodger, 19 March 2007 - 10:26 PM.
"Nature's Failure to Function in a 'Predictable Way'... 500 years ago?"
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.