QQQQ daily
#31
Posted 17 April 2007 - 02:12 PM
#32
Posted 17 April 2007 - 02:28 PM
and for fun here it is on a choppy 55m chart which gave a false baby cross yesterday, but
showing something more today
Edited by Mr Dev, 17 April 2007 - 02:30 PM.
.. .. ..
Mr Dev
......trading is basically a simple operation, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity.
.....timing,..... is ....everything !
... remember no guessing visit MrDev!
#33
Posted 17 April 2007 - 03:13 PM
#34
Posted 17 April 2007 - 03:27 PM
Edited by hiker, 17 April 2007 - 03:28 PM.
#35
Posted 17 April 2007 - 03:27 PM
#36
Posted 17 April 2007 - 03:34 PM
Edited by hiker, 17 April 2007 - 03:35 PM.
#37
Posted 17 April 2007 - 03:54 PM
#38
Posted 17 April 2007 - 04:06 PM
page 17 of the book contrasts more simply than you state above the utility of the 3 ema vs. the displaced 3 ema...you may be correct. let's watch over time whether both the displaced 3 ema and the 5 sma continue to move up with price on this daily in the future..perhaps it is a learning example going forward:
#39
Posted 17 April 2007 - 04:39 PM
#40
Posted 17 April 2007 - 05:27 PM
Thanks. I'll have to pick up a copy of the book.
If my theory is correct it would not work as well in a less emotional market. For example with the 10 yr, where the impulse to buy on a rising trend would not be as high; but it would work quite well with gold.
Started to play with it a bit; It is deceptive when looking at a chart because it carries future information back in time 3 bars.
The lead portion of the network requires you to do a comparison with price 3 bars back in time.
Looking at Gold and TLT I do not see much of a difference.
One way to get an approximation of the lead portion of the network before the 3 period delay is to look for a negative three period ROC of the 3 ema.