490 replies to this topic

[Rogerdodger]

EPA accused of rigging reports, colluding with Greens...

[Rogerdodger]

SCIENCE. Really? Sounds a bit more kike a political movement.

Whistleblowers Claim NOAA Rushed Contentious Climate Paper Despite Reservations...

Scientists manipulated data to advance President Obama’s agenda and timed the study’s release to coincide the the administration’s new limits on emissions from coal plants.
Smith told Pritzker that the whistleblowers’ allegations make it more crucial that he be provided with the scientists’ internal e-mails and communications. If NOAA does not produce the e-mails he is seeking by Friday, the chairman said, “I will be forced to consider use of compulsory process,” a threat to subpoena the commerce secretary herself.

Edited by Rogerdodger, 19 November 2015 - 10:32 AM.

[Rogerdodger]

FLASHBACK: Temp data fiddling 'biggest science scandal ever'...

 

Suspicious one-way “adjustments” from the cabol:
A degree or two higher and you get a hockey stick which melts Iceland's historically cold 1970's ice which almost devastated the country’s economy.

 

In each case there were found the same suspicious one-way “adjustments” at South American weather stations. First these were made by the US government’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). They were then amplified by two of the main official surface records, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (Giss) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), which use the warming trends to estimate temperatures across the vast regions of the Earth where no measurements are taken. Yet these are the very records on which scientists and politicians rely for their belief in “global warming”.
Homewood has now turned his attention to the weather stations across much of the Arctic, between Canada (51 degrees W) and the heart of Siberia (87 degrees E). Again, in nearly every case, the same one-way adjustments have been made, to show warming up to 1 degree C or more higher than was indicated by the data that was actually recorded. This has surprised no one more than Traust Jonsson, who was long in charge of climate research for the Iceland met office (and with whom Homewood has been in touch). Jonsson was amazed to see how the new version completely “disappears” Iceland’s “sea ice years” around 1970, when a period of extreme cooling almost devastated his country’s economy.

 

 

Edited by Rogerdodger, 29 November 2015 - 12:56 PM.

[Rogerdodger]

Follow the money to find out who will really profit from the GLOBAL WARMING...err..CLIMATE CHANGE taxation scam:

 

George Soros, Tom Steyer 'investors' in energy plan...

[Rogerdodger]

If the "TRUTH" is so obvious, why do they fear questions? 

Why do they alter data and hide e-mails?

Why did they imprison Galileo just for his scientific observations?

 

Because: "THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN!"

 

'Green Gestapo': BBC removes radio host after mocks 'global warming'...

[Rogerdodger]

NOAA Relies On 'Compromised' Thermometers That Inflate 'Warming'...

 

"SCIENCE" Really?

 

“The majority of weather stations used by NOAA to detect climate change temperature signal have been compromised by encroachment of artificial surfaces like concrete, asphalt, and heat sources like air conditioner exhausts,” Anthony Watts, a seasoned meteorologist and lead author of the study, said in a statement Thursday.

These “compromised” weather stations run hotter than stations that are well-sited, and are used by NOAA as a benchmark to make upward adjustments for other weather stations that are part of the agency’s official temperature record.

 

Edited by Rogerdodger, 17 December 2015 - 07:49 PM.

[Rogerdodger]

Putting politics before science to advance global warming alarmism

 

NOAA Sued for Climate Data Scandal Docs...

 

NOAA often fails to consider all available data in its determinations and climate change reports to the public. A recent study by NOAA, published in the journal Science, made “adjustments” to historical temperature records and NOAA trumpeted the findings as refuting the nearly two-decade pause in global warming. The study’s authors claimed these adjustments were supposedly based on new data and new methodology. But the study failed to include satellite data.

 

 

“We have little doubt that our lawsuit helped to pry these scandalous climate change report documents from the Obama administration.  The Obama administration seems to care not one whit for a congressional subpoena but knows from prior experience that a Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit cannot be ignored,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “Given the lawless refusal to comply with our FOIA request and a congressional subpoena, we have little doubt that the documents will show the Obama administration put politics before science to advance global warming alarmism.”

 

(For True Believers, facts have no relevance.)

Edited by Rogerdodger, 22 December 2015 - 09:53 PM.

[Rogerdodger]

Cycles are a part of the climate change which began on day one...

 

Record Snowfalls hit Canada, Mexico, Texas, China..

 

Blizzard kills thousands of cows, threatens TX dairy business...

 

California Sierra snowpack at 136 percent

Last Jan. 1, the snowpack was a meager 45 percent of the historical average. On April 1, it hit a record low of 5 percent.

 

The California drought is helping return the weather pattern to normal.

Scientists studying long-ago California climate have realized that the 20th century was abnormally wet and rainy, according to researcher Lynn Ingram, professor in the Department of Earth and Planetary Science at UC Berkeley.

“The past 150 years have been wetter than the past 2,000 years,” Ingram said. “And this is when our water development, population growth and agricultural industry were established.”

... paleoclimatologists have learned California suffered a long dry spell from 1,800 to 600 years ago.

 

Malevich, Woodhouse & Meko 2013 in Journal of Hydrology, showed that by using climate reconstructed from tree rings, the authors indicate severe 60 year droughts are possible in northern California and southern Oregon, which puts our current "worst in recorded history" droughts into context when considering the past 10,000 years of proxy records.

Edited by Rogerdodger, 02 January 2016 - 03:18 PM.

[SixSigma]

 

If the "TRUTH" is so obvious, why do they fear questions? 

Why do they alter data and hide e-mails?

Why did they imprison Galileo just for his scientific observations?

 

Because: "THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN!"

 

 

The above portion of the below quote couldn't be more sage-like.

 

Ecclesiastes 1:9

What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.

 

With all respect to Mr. Martin Armstrong, who I unintentionally misquoted the other day, and who is likely one of the more credible of the current people prognosticating the future, no one has a crystal ball. I am just a regular person, who has never claimed to be able to predict the future any more than anyone else. But I try to be a good lifetime student, and keep my eyes and mind open, and like many here are interested in cycles.

 

To think that man's byproducts don't have any effect on the environment per se just isn't true; just look at the trash bin in the Pacific to see the evidence, or the pollution in the air or water in a China for example (other places too). But like you, I look at the longer cycles, and evidence such as tree-rings and sunspot cycles (as well as objective reporting from current native weather sites past and present) paint a much different picture than that of the  pundits, and those that would "profit" from the doom and gloom currently "reported". The carbon gas argument is anything but clear at this point, but there were obviously periods in earths history where there was more carbon than now. The main lesson in all of this is not to let anyone put a ring through your nose, or blinders on your eyes, so that you can be lead around.   

 

Thanks for your objective determination and informative summary here.

Edited by reddybuild, 07 January 2016 - 03:14 AM.

[Rogerdodger]

NOAA scientists upwardly adjusted temperature readings taken from the engine intakes of ships to eliminate the “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record.

 

“Adjusting good data upward to match bad data seems questionable.”

 

300 Scientists Urge NOAA To Stop Hiding 'Warming Data'...

 

“In our opinion… NOAA has failed to observe the OMB [Office of Management and Budget] (and its own) guidelines, established in relation to the Data Quality Act.”

 

The NOAA study in dispute claims the scientists found a solution to the 15-year “pause” in global warming. They “adjusted” the hiatus in warming the temperature record from 1998 to 2012, the “new analysis exhibits more than twice as much warming as the old analysis at the global scale.”

“As has been acknowledged by numerous scientists, the engine intake data are clearly contaminated by heat conduction from the structure, and as such, never intended for scientific use.”

 

Of the 300 letter signers, 150 had doctorates in a related field. Signers also included: 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. Additionally, one signer was a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two were astronauts.

Edited by Rogerdodger, 28 January 2016 - 08:34 PM.