Nearly all historic changes in climate are related to changes in atmospheric gases of CO2 and CH4.
Yes but is it Cause or Effect?
It can be both. CO2 released into the atm holds heat and warms the oceans. Warmer oceans release more CO2 into the atm. This is call a "positive feedback loop." This is not rocket science; your cerebral lobes could handle it easily if you can just get your amygdala to set them free.
Warm air will hold more CO2 than cooler climate periods.
Hot tea will hold many times more sugar than cold tea.
But does the sugar make the tea hot?
You're conflating physical processes and getting pretty confused. Sugar is not a gas; CO2 is, and it will gas off at a greater rate as the liquid it is dissolved in. Yes, a warmer atmosphere holds more CO2
and more CO2 in the atm will trap heat - they are not mutually exclusive and if fact provide a positive feedback loop.
PS: Water vapor has a zillion times more effect as a greenhouse gas than the minuscule amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere.
The global water cycle takes care of that - there is no more or less water since gravitational effects eventually stablized the earth's total water. That is not true of rapid and enormous atmospheric CO2 additions from burning fossil fuels. It's pretty simple mass balancing taught in 8th grade physics.
Cold or hot, either way we must raise taxes to save the world from something.
And exactly what taxes have been raised?
The Big Freeze - yadda, yadda, yadda
Yes, Roger, solar radiance would indicate that the earth should be cooling; it's not. The question is why do you let your amygdala cause you to ignore what that means?
John Galt shrugged, outsourced to Red China and opened a hedge fund for unregulated securitized credit derivatives.
If the world didn't suck, wouldn't we all just fly off?