"We admit that in many places and in ordinary times the defendants in saying all that was said in the circular would have been within their constitutional rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting ‘Fire’ in a theater and causing a panic. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances, and are of such a nature, as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is question of proximity and degree." Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in the case Schenck v. United States, 1919.
Interestingly enough, the case involved the prosecution of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer for distributing leaflets urging people to refuse to comply with the draft. Schenck, the general secretary of the Socialist Party at the time, opposed U.S. involvement in World War I and believed that conscription was akin to slavery.
As far as Trump is concerned, I challenge anyone to bring up any video of him promoting a riot at the Capitol. To save you time, you won't find any, otherwise, it would had been plastered all over the weekend news ad nauseam. Just another hear say label by Bolsheviks who don't care one iota about you or your families...only their power to control you, and to that end, to make sure that Donald Trump never darkens their doorstep again in the future.
what isnt reported is the timeline......the attack on the capitol occured while the president was speaking 45minutes walking distance away
scroll down to :"dodgy timeline" https://thenationalp...t-claims-bogus/