Jump to content



Photo

OT : CO2 emissions


  • Please log in to reply
105 replies to this topic

#1 andr99

andr99

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 7,438 posts

Posted 27 July 2023 - 03:08 PM

I'm planning to go to live abroad because I've got enough of all the leftist idiots that I've got around here where I live. They are protesting because they say we need to cut our CO2 emissions.........and they don't know, these retards, that the contribution of italy to the global worldwide emission of CO2 is 0.8% which means less than 1% (Europe on the whole 8%). Why these idiots don't go to protest in China that is one of the largest producer of CO2 in the world, is something that should be investigated under the term ''mental illness of simpletons that have been raised applying strict communist doctrine''...........VIVA MARX, VIVA LENIN and the wh@@@s of their mothers.   


Edited by andr99, 27 July 2023 - 03:08 PM.

forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard


#2 andr99

andr99

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 7,438 posts

Posted 27 July 2023 - 03:28 PM

all due to the fact that two days ago the North of italy experienced in the deep of the night, one of the worst storms that ever occurred here. Locally there have been places where the pieces of ice getting down from the sky, where as large as apricots while the wind was around 100 Km per hour. In other words a devastation. Damages were high and obviously the simpletons have raised against our government that is guilty of not cutting enough our CO2 emissions. Mathematics is not for idiots as they can't understand what 0.8% means   

 

 

 

in my area it occurred in late night


Edited by andr99, 27 July 2023 - 03:38 PM.

forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard


#3 hhh

hhh

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,065 posts

Posted 27 July 2023 - 04:24 PM

As you well know, it has absolutely nothing to do with CO2. It's the Sun, its spots, and Earth's position in the cosmos and their interrelationships affecting cosmic rays which in turn affect weather. People think that because we've had a several decade run of amenable weather that we are owed that for eternity. We're not, and the weather's going to do what it darnn well pleases and all we can do is adapt.


Edited by hhh, 27 July 2023 - 04:24 PM.


#4 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,873 posts

Posted 27 July 2023 - 07:11 PM

Why these idiots don't go to protest in China

...Cause they will "disappear" like Russians near windows?

 

A thoughtful person might conclude that China owns the US "established science" community, etc.

 

"According to recent data, China has outpaced all its competitors and has become the largest investor in the domestic solar energy sector"

 

Large wind turbine manufacturers;

 

 

1936: Nationally, about 5,000 people died from the heat.
Locally in 1936, we had over two straight months of 100+ temperatures.
We might get ten 100+ days during this "Above Average" year.
Now our issue seems to be the far northern Jet Stream and the "Heat Dome" that it causes.
 
Hot one place, Cold in another.

July-Snow.jpg

 

The 1936 Dust Bowl was blamed on poor farming methods.

Maybe today it's the trees that we are cutting down for CONCRETE PARKING LOTS AND FREEWAYS?

 

Urban-Heat-Cause.jpg

 

"They took all the trees and put them in a tree museum, Charge a dollar and a half just to see 'em"

Scotland chops down 16 million trees to make way for wind farms...


Edited by Rogerdodger, 27 July 2023 - 07:46 PM.


#5 Rich C

Rich C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 367 posts

Posted 27 July 2023 - 08:38 PM

As you well know, it has absolutely nothing to do with CO2. It's the Sun, its spots, and Earth's position in the cosmos and their interrelationships affecting cosmic rays which in turn affect weather. People think that because we've had a several decade run of amenable weather that we are owed that for eternity. We're not, and the weather's going to do what it darnn well pleases and all we can do is adapt.

NASA  says no, not sunspots.

 

https://climate.nasa...global-warming/


Blogging at http://RichInvesting.wordpress.com

 

My swing trades typically last a couple of weeks to a couple of months. 


#6 andr99

andr99

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 7,438 posts

Posted 28 July 2023 - 05:39 AM

 

As you well know, it has absolutely nothing to do with CO2. It's the Sun, its spots, and Earth's position in the cosmos and their interrelationships affecting cosmic rays which in turn affect weather. People think that because we've had a several decade run of amenable weather that we are owed that for eternity. We're not, and the weather's going to do what it darnn well pleases and all we can do is adapt.

NASA  says no, not sunspots.

 

https://climate.nasa...global-warming/

 

 

thank you, this is a good argument............now we have to send the leftist italian simpletons to China to tell the Chinese it's time to give up with their CO2 emissions

 

...........the only thing I do not agree is that watts measure power not energy, the unit of measure of energy is the joule

 

however power is energy divided for time unit.......so measuring the the Sun activity on Earth's surface using the watt makes sense.........even if it's not strictly a unit of measure of energy


Edited by andr99, 28 July 2023 - 05:47 AM.

forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard


#7 andr99

andr99

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 7,438 posts

Posted 28 July 2023 - 06:39 AM

energy divided for time..........which means energy per time unit..............

 

the number of watts the Sun delivers to the Earth represents the number of joules it delivers to the Earth in one second............so that in the article it would be more correct saying....''watts...........energy per time unit....etc.etc.''

 

However the concept is clear the same


Edited by andr99, 28 July 2023 - 06:43 AM.

forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard


#8 hhh

hhh

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,065 posts

Posted 28 July 2023 - 08:39 AM

NASA: Never A Straight Answer. The discussion is too simplistic. It's not just total energy that influences weather on Earth. It's cosmic ray interaction and nucleation of water vapour resulting in varying cloud formation and corresponding weather. If NASA doesn't even know what the SI unit of energy is, do you trust them with an arm-waving simplistic argument to support the one-world communist takeover via climate bull$hit?


Edited by hhh, 28 July 2023 - 08:39 AM.


#9 andr99

andr99

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 7,438 posts

Posted 28 July 2023 - 08:50 AM

 If NASA doesn't even know what the SI unit of energy is, do you trust them..............

 

they know better than me, it wasn' t them that wrote the article I think.......and when someone writes an article something may escape........just an imperfection, nothing more. And if they say the Sun is not implied, everyone would

better believe them 


Edited by andr99, 28 July 2023 - 08:51 AM.

forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard


#10 hhh

hhh

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,065 posts

Posted 28 July 2023 - 09:03 AM

if it's government funded, it's not to be trusted in a propaganda war.